Roxanne Sorooshian writes that "dreich" is the nation's favourite word, using a spelling that has been used by other commentators (Not all richt on the nicht, Comment, January 27).
If you based it on the Anglo-Saxon pronunciation principle as in German, should it not be ie rather than ei? Consider Dienstag (Tuesday), liebe (love), tier (animal) – they are all pronounced "ee" not "y" as in mein, wein, stein, dein and so on. On this basis it would sound drych.
As one who grew up in Ayrshire's mining community, I would add that you can walk the streets of Cumnock, New Cumnock and Auchinleck and still hear nicht, bricht, licht and micht hear ither aul' Scoattish lingo.
My daughter, an English teacher in Italy, has a broad east Ayrshire accent. She gave a writing exercise to one of her young students, who had written: "I goat a nice present for my burthday." An acute foreign observer of an old Scottish tongue!
Michael Flynn
Glasgow
The word "dreich" is of Middle Scots and originally Anglian (the northern dialect of Anglo-Saxon) origin. English, a cousin, comes from the Saxon dialects of the south, which developed into Middle English.
When Scots ceased to be the language of authority, it remained as a language of speech, song and poetry. Each area developed its own dialect, from Shetlandic to Doric to Ulster Scots and, as pronunciation varied when it came to be written down, the spelling varied also. Anyone writing in Scots today has to decide which spelling to use, from the seven or so possibilities in the Concise Scots Dictionary and then be consistent.
We have always known the celebration as a "Burns Supper", and considered "Burns' Night" to be the English translation of "Burns Nicht". There is a loss of the "ch" sound in the speech of some younger people in Scotland, and in commentators from elsewhere (who have no trouble with Bach). There is also a loss of Scots, or even Scottish English terms: for example, we see the use of English "jab" for "jag".
Susan FG Forde
Scotlandwell
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article