YOUR correspondent Gavin R Tait asks "if one assumes that all tax receipts up to the date of independence pass to the Westminster Treasury" where will his salary as a public employee come from (Letters, February 25)?
Why would he assume such a thing?
I suspect it would not be beyond the wit of even this Westminster Government to come to an arrangement with the Scottish Government to bridge the transition to independence, unless we are to assume malice from politicians in London.
Mr Tait then goes on to say that after independence the Scottish national debt would be 40% of GDP. Given that the UK national debt is well over 60% of GDP and forecast to go beyond 70% then this would be a marvellous outcome for an independent Scotland.
I can see no reason either why a resource-rich county like Scotland should fear the ratings agencies in the way that George Osborne or Mr Tait do. Scotland is not a junk country and wouldn't have a junk rating.
John Jamieson,
7 Monument Road,
Ayr.
Gavin R Tait suggests that Scotland might not have the ability to pay its bills on Independence Day because the infrastructure might not be in place, and we could therefore be bankrupt before we started. You would be forgiven for thinking that no other country had ever gained its independence before now.
Supporters of the No campaign will need to improve their selection of battlegrounds if they are to contribute meaningfully to this debate.
Blair Allan,
2 Glasdrum Grove,
Fort William.
LET us not mourn the loss of an AAA rating, this being one of the factors enabling Gordon Brown to borrow so much when he was Chancellor, leaving our children and grandchildren with extraordinary debt.
William Durward.
20 South Erskine Park,
Bearsden.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article