Should a university be fined if it recruits too many students?
It depends who you ask, but the universities themselves have always been resistant to the idea and in The Herald today, Universities Scotland, the body which represents principals, has called for a relaxation of the fines so they can recruit more students without incurring any financial penalty.
It is perfectly understandable of Universities Scotland to adopt such a position. The organisation's function is to represent, and fight for, the university sector and when student places are publicly funded, more students means more money at a time when budgets are under considerable strain.
The Scottish Government has to take a more balanced approach. On the one hand, it should be encouraging more students to go to university, particularly from deprived backgrounds and particularly in subjects such as science where graduates can contribute significantly to Scotland's economic future.
However, the Government also has to work with finite budgets and show restraint with the public purse. In an ideal world, taxpayers would fund as many students as wanted to go to university, but there has to be realism in the administration of the university sector. The fines, which are enforced by the Scottish Funding Council, are part of such realism.
To some extent, the Government has succeeded in striking the right balance between these factors. Aware that there is a growing demand for university education, it has increased the number of publicy-funded places in recent years. It also won praise for removing the restrictions on the number of places that could be offered in the Stem subjects of science, technology, engineering and mathematics, although it also attracted criticism for re-imposing them in due course.
Scotland's universities believe the Government could go much further in this area and facilitate, rather than resist, a growth in student numbers. Alastair Sim, the director of Universities Scotland, says the fact Scottish applicants have increased for the third year in a row demonstrates what a high demand there is for higher education among Scots and he believes the penalties for over-recruiting should be lifted between now and the summer to help universities meet that need.
There is some merit in this argument, particularly as the economy continues to recover and begins to demand more skilled graduates. Fining universities for responding to the demand for places also carries the risk of being counter-productive and making the financial difficulties of some universities even worse.
However, any relaxation of the fines also carries a cost for the Scottish Government, which has to keep a control on how much it pays for supporting students. This means scrapping the financial penalties is not an option, but the Scottish Government should also keep them under constant review. The penalties are there as a means of controlling public expenditure, but it is just as important that they do not stifle the ambition to ensure as many young people as possible have the chance to go to university.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article