Scottish university principals are worried about the impact of independence, and with good reason.
They are permitted under EU law to charge tuition to students from the rest of the UK (rUK), while providing it free to Scottish students.
This is because EU law permits discrimination inside member states while prohibiting discrimination between member states (meaning students from France, Germany and other EU countries attending a Scottish university enjoy free tuition, just like Scots, while students from the rest of the UK must pay the full amount).
Fair? Arguably not, but that is the reality of the system. So what would happen if Scotland became independent and joined the EU as a new member state? Logic would dictate that Scottish universities would have to start giving free tuition to rUK students, as citizens of a separate EU member state.
That would result in a major loss of income to Scottish universities and could lead to them being inundated with applications from rUK.
The Scottish Government maintains that this would not happen, and that universities could continue to charge fees to rUK students, pointing to the fact that the EU allows for "objective justification", meaning that it might be persuaded to bend the rules in exceptional circumstances.
Unsurprisingly, Universities Scotland is not reassured by ministers' "it'll-be-all-right-on-the-night" approach and, in a submission to Holyrood's education committee, has asked for "robust, legally defensible certainty" from the Scottish Government, in advance of independence, over whether it can continue charging fees to rUK students.
Now the Royal Society of Edinburgh (RSE) has weighed in with its own submission, stating it has considered two legal opinions and has concluded it would be very difficult for the Scottish Government to justify continuing to charge tuition to rUK students in the event of independence.
Coming from such a respected and impartial body, this will increase pressure on the Scottish Government to explain how it can guarantee that the present arrangements would continue.
The Scottish Government does not publish its legal advice, so there is no way of judging its strength or weakness but, as the RSE has made clear, heavyweight legal opinions suggest this is a difficult case to win.
Why would the EU consider Scotland's case exceptional? Ministers would no doubt argue that Scottish universities would be at risk of being swamped with applications from rUK students if tuition were free for them, because of their proximity to Scotland and their shared language and culture. But the RSE is not persuaded the EU would be moved by that argument.
As with the question of currency union, the Scottish Government has offered no Plan B as to what would happen if the EU did not allow Scottish universities to keep charging rUK students tuition fees.
Universities understandably fear it could result in a protracted court battle with an unfavourable outcome and they have demanded to know how ministers intend to win. They deserve a response.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article