THE 2011 Census recorded that there were 7.5 million foreign-born residents in the UK, corresponding to 11.9 per cent of the total population. A 2010 estimate suggested that 4.76 million (7.7 per cent) were born outside the EU and 2.24 million (3.6 per cent) were born in another EU member state. The 2015 Government briefing paper states: “In 2013, there were 23,584 applications for asylum in the UK, covering 29,875 people comprising asylum seekers and their dependants. In the same year, immigration was approximately 526,000. The Office for National Statostics estimates that asylum seekers were around 4.6 per cent of immigration in 2013”. Seen against a background of these figures the few thousand highly motivated migrants trying to enter the UK via the French channel ports is literally a drop in the ocean (UK and France to increase security after migrant dies”, The Herald, July 30).
One comes to the inescapable conclusion that all the disruption to cross-channel traffic the expense and the fatalities is simply the Government trying to show it can manage a system that is patently shambolic. It is ironic that it is happening at the time of year that London suffers it annual invasion of wealthy Arab oil multi-millionaires escaping the rigours of Ramadan back home. As usual there appear to be no borders or barriers is you can afford to bring your Swarovoski crystal-encrusted Ferrari with you. Perhaps rather than spending £7m on trying to keep these 3,000 potential immigrants out of the UK it would be better and cheaper just to eliminate the problem by giving them a UK/EU passport and £2,000 each to support them till they found a job, as those who came before them seem to have done.
David J Crawford,
Flat 3/3 131 Shuna Street, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel