LORD Murray, the former Lord Advocate has penned an intelligent and informed Agenda contribution (“People power can bring nuclear disarmament at a stroke”, The Herald, August 3) However, he makes no mention of a vital international campaign working to achieve this goal,.
In December 2015, 158 states took part in the Vienna Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons. At this, Austria proposed the “Austrian Pledge”, which is a promise to create an international treaty banning all nuclear weapons. This would fill the unacceptable “legal gap” whereby nuclear weapons are the only weapons of mass destruction not yet explicitly prohibited under international law. So far, 113 states have signed this. The UK has not, and has no intention of doing so.
Margaret Mead famously said “never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has”. Lord Murray rightly evokes this principle. However this small group of people can be organised into communities as states, which can work together. This is what is happening – and why the referendum was such a catastrophe not only for Scotland, but for the world.
An independent Scotland would have been the first nuclear-armed state to break the deadlock, by scrapping Trident. Tragically, we said yes to Trident, and no to independence. But the fight goes on.
I was disappointed to note that he refers to our H-bombs as a “nuclear deterrent”, a self-vindicating euphemism which justifies the object it denotes. We have a deterrent – they have nuclear weapons.
It has always been thus, ever since we used the bomb on other human being in Japan. This is the 70th anniversary of our using the “deterrent” on Hiroshima, the greatest single-act war crime in history.
It is precisely because we justify Hiroshima, that we justify Trident. After all, it’s only a deterrent.
Brian M Quail,
2 Hyndland Avenue, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel