We need to talk about what Syria means for our holidays.
I know this sounds awful. After all, amid all the bloodshed of the Middle East - the bombings, the shootings and the resulting refugees - maybe the last thing we should be worrying about is our fortnight in the sun.
Earlier this year tabloid stories of British visitors vexed with Syrian refugees on Greek beaches were met with shrill derision on social media. And rightly so.
But conflict in Syria and Iraq - and wider spread of Islamist terror - really is having an impact on tourism, specifically on where Europeans take their breaks. Bluntly, we are shunning the Islamic world.
The consequences of this are already grave.
The short-term impact is obvious: unemployment.
Take Tunisia. About one in seven jobs in the country were in tourism last year. Not now. Visitor numbers are down 20 per cent since the beach killing spree this summer, pictured above.. Hotels and restaurants are laying off staff. So are their suppliers, even farms.
Egypt's Sharm al Sheikh resort - where ISIS brought down a Russian holiday jet at the end of October - is bracing itself for much the same.
Analysis: The Sunday Herald's Trevor Royle on trouble in Egypt's Sinai Peninsula
After this attack, Russia, rather slowly, stopped flights to Egypt.
Two million Russians holiday in the north African country - which is due south of Moscow - ever year.
Another three million go to Turkey. Last week - in another complication from the Syrian conflict - Russia stopped all tour operators flying to Turkey.
That, all in, is 5m visitors denied to the Turkish and Egyptian holiday sectors next year. That is huge.
Tourism has almost been weaponised.
But it isn't just Russians who will be looking for somewhere else to go next summer.
David Cameron came under fire in Egypt for being cautious after the Russian jet was blown up, stopping British flights. These are political decisions. Diplomatic ones. And they hurt.
In other Arab or Islamic destinations commercial operators are making their own decisions.
EasyJet has announced it will drop flights to Marrakech in Morocco from Glasgow Airport in June.
Ali Gayward, the airline's boss in Scotland, said this was "because of recent terrorist activity in places like Tunisia".
People who know about terrorism say this is just what ISIS and Al-Qaeda and other extremists want. Economic decline is good for them. So too is the wider disconnection between Europe and the Middle East.
Because the consequences of holidaymakers staying away from Arab North Africa are not just economic.
A warning: I am going to sound wishy-washy about tourism. That is because I think - despite its terrible green credentials and sometimes ghastly homogeneity - it can be a force for good.
Let's not pretend that every visitor who flopped on a sunbed in Sousse or Sharm got huge insights in to the Arab world.
Or that they reciprocate Arab hospitality when refugees knock at our doors seeking shelter. But long-term mass tourism does build affinity. And it can spread ideas, even liberal ideas.
Clever people, for example, make a case that sunbathing North Europeans on the beaches of the Costas helped 1970s Spain emerge from the shadow of fascist dictatorship.
Equally, it is hard to view a place where you spend your summers - or winters - as alien, dangerous or, well, bombable.
There is already a gulf of understanding between Europe and the Islamic world already. Without holidaymakers, it is going to get worse.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel