A JUDGE says Alastair Carmichael lied about his part in the Sturgeon/Cameron French leak. It must be admitted that the idea that our First Minister really wanted a Tory General Election win led not a few astray, but unsubstantiated promulgation was naughty, let alone the subsequent denial of involvement. Inevitably SNP braves were orchestrated into a war party to pull Mr Carmichael down and out. However, a look at last year's Scotland's Future is a reminder not to dig a hole too deep for escape.
We were promised then that following independence the Bank of England would act as lender of last resort (did anyone ask the bank?) and that oil would sail on at more than $100 per barrel (did anyone ask OPEC/Saudi Arabia?) We were told at this May's General Election that we had 24 hours to vote to end austerity (never mind the annual fiscal deficits and accumulated debt).
Of course, sunny forecasts and political rhetoric are accepted components of getting your party into power, but virulent character assassinations and hounding on the social media leave a feeling of deep unease.
Are our democratic processes at risk from militants striving to achieve their goals at all costs?
Joe Darby,
Glenburn, St Martins Mill, Cullicudden, Dingwall.
"HE that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her". It is gratifying to find at least eight Herald readers who are either without sin or, being in sin, are sufficiently valiant to cast a stone (Letters, December 11.
The thrust of the petition lodged with the Election Court was that Mr Carmichael had breached a penal section of the Representation of the People Act 1983, and, having thereby committed an illegal practice in terms of that section, his election was void.
The two judges of the Election Court, applying the principles laid down in the Act, as they were bound to do, found that Mr Carmichael had not been proved to have committed an illegal practice and that his election was not therefore void.
If Mr Carmichael chooses to stand at the next General Election, those alienated by his conduct in April 2015 will not vote for him; those who have found him to be a vigorous and helpful constituency MP will vote for him.
I think that the electors of Orkney and Shetland will be able to make up their own minds without any lectures in moral philosophy from your readers or from any other source.
John Flett,
Halvard, Dundas Crescent, Kirkwall, Orkney.
THE Carmichael case has done us all a favour. It has confirmed what every mature and intelligent voter already knew: you cannot trust politicians to tell the truth on every occasion, and therefore everything that they tell us should be approached with a healthy scepticism.
Who in post-referendum Scotland would've thunk it?
Peter A Russell,
87 Munro Road, Jordanhill, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel