I WISH I was Alex Salmond. You are shocked. You say: “Do you want those jowls? The opprobrium? The inability to touch your toes without your bottom blowing a raspberry?”
All right, fair enough. Presented with a small, individual bread-and-butter pudding from Lidl, I have taken eight or arguably nine eggs and cracked them open upon it. Let me be more specific: I wish I was Alex Salmond’s wallet.
Oh, to be so capacious, to jingle so merrily. My life would be complete, and I’d want for nothing, except better hair and a less feminine musculature.
For the avoidance of doubt, I speak of myself in the latter regard. I’ve no idea about Mr Salmond’s musculature. He has only punched me about three times in my journalistic career, and once wrestled me to the ground when we were both vying for the last three peanuts in a bowl at an important social function.
I don’t recall any particular impression of strength or its lack compared to other politicians who have wrestled me to the ground over the years.
But, more than physical strength, the former First Minister has great mental strength, which he is in need of to cope with the brickbats bunged his way on a daily basis.
The latest furore involves his robust financial health. Apart from being an MP, he earns a six-figure sum from freelance newspaper columns for various publications, as do I, though my six-figure sum has a decimal point some way from the end.
Now he is to earn more money from hosting a radio phone-in show in yonder London, where undoubtedly the top Scottish Nationalist will be billed as a “shock-jock”.
I hope he’s paid handsomely for this important work as studies show that, without exception, people who phone such shows are mental.
Nor am I frothing at the mouth about the earnings of a man routinely described as “the world’s leading Eck”.
He gives generously to charity and, had he devoted himself entirely to the private sector, would have earned a right fortune which I, as an old-fashioned socialist, would have confiscated for the greater good.
His would never be the fate of those former Labour MPs having difficulty finding work, despite their clear records of principle and integrity. Something in that last sentence isn’t quite right and, as I’m very busy writing this column, I leave it up to you to amend.
Ecksforth is a go-getter, a do-er. He doesn’t get downhearted. In his place, beset politically by the sort of half-baked tatties who phone radio shows, I’d have done a Captain Blackadder and fled to Tibet, there to spend the rest of my days disguised as a yak.
Instead, he goes on the radio to yack. That takes brio. To illustrate what he’s like, here’s a true story minimally embellished every two or three words.
Once, I was sauntering down Edinburgh’s Royal Mile, thinking about death and – quite unrelately – America, when I bumped into Eck waddling in my direction.
“Hello, Eck, I am going to America soon,” I said despondently.
“To Tartan Day?” he asked.
“Afraid so.”
“Come with me,” he said. And, to my surprise, I found myself trailing in his slipstream, until we reached his office.
“What will happen after I die?” I asked, by way of making conversation.
“You will ascend to heaven to live with the angels,” he said brusquely. “In the meantime, I am giving you these.”
He handed me a list of names and numbers.
“Are they angels?” I asked facetiously.
“No, they are real people who will be able to help you. They wield enormous power in America. They’ll give you good quotes, inside information.”
I thanked him sincerely and left, carefully placing the list in a litter bin outside. The point about this ode is the way he’d leapt into action on my behalf, even though I couldn’t give a flying one. He’s a do-er, d’you see?
Over the years, I had mocked Eck mercilessly. Nothing substantial, mainly his eyebrows, for the disturbing way that they rise like two unicorns astride a coat of arms.
However, eyebrows apart, you could see this was a man going places. And now he’s going on the radio. The work will add to his financial stock, and I do not grudge him it.
He is worth his weight in gold. Even if he needs to diet a little.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here