I NOTE that the anti-smoking lobby has had the brass neck to link smoking to poverty, to low IQ, and mental illness and dementia (“Plea for action against smoking in deprived areas”, The Herald, January 18). First of all, people are not poor because they smoke, rather they smoke because they are poor and it is the only thing they have to relieve themselves of their situation. Secondly, the idea that smoking leads to a low IQ means that the anti-smokers have just condemned the likes of Einstein, Picasso and a large section of the most ground breaking scientists and artists in history to being "stupid". Thirdly, for those unfortunates who are suffering or have suffered from mental illness it is often the case that smoking is what holds them together. Fourthly, that smoking causes dementia is very unlikely. Similar to those who suffer from mental illness, smoking amongst dementia patients may be the only thing giving them at least some form of connection to the world.
The point is that the allegation that such groups become dementia patients or become mentally ill is built on a false and rather dangerous and simplistic premise: that these illnesses will disappear by stopping smoking. Also, the further implication that smoking makes you stupid and causes poverty must rank as the wildest accusation that the anti-smoking lobby has come up with yet. How long before smoking becomes a nice excuse for the cutting of benefits of those already suffering from poverty and deprivation?
The Government help suggested for the open-all-hours corner shop to help them not sell cigarettes will not work. In a world where we are told austerity rules, where does the money come from?
Deprivation needs far more constructive societal help from our politicians than attacking tobacco.
Alex Flett,
Lochfergus House, Kirkcudbright.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel