THE recent fiasco involving Edinburgh City Council and the Edinburgh Schools Partnership ("Schools closure crisis: Bill for childcare could top £1 million", the Herald, April 13) epitomises what I believe to be a current problem with quality control throughout the industry.
Take, for examplem the Clyde Arc (the Squinty Bridge) at Finnieston in Glasgow and our Scottish Parliament building, where components failed shortly after construction was complete, resulting in the embarrassing closure of the facilities.
In the 1960s and 70s, any civil or building construction project necessitated the inspection of all components prior to a certificate being issued to verify said works ready for placement, for example, of wet concrete into a mould: shuttering, reinforcement and holding down bolts being the items for compliance.
I can recall one project where the civil engineering inspector was often at loggerheads with the reinforcement ganger demanding the correct amount of space between a shutter mould and the steel bars (cover). Needless to say, the inspector always prevailed.
Since the late 1970s the inspection regime has been eroded in the main by the squeezing of the design team fees. These would nearly always include a full on-site inspection team covering all aspects of construction. Now the norm is a weekly or fortnightly visit to see the product “as built” instead of a kinetic situation.
The Health and Safety at Work Act of 1974 adequately caters for the policing of projects in all aspects of construction; so the framework is there to prosecute for any failure. The problem is how does one ensure the construction work is up to standard in the first place? This is where we need to revisit the supervisory and inspection provisions of the 1960s and 70s and reintroduce compulsory monitoring.
Who pays? A couple of pence in the pound on to council tax and 30p a square foot on to speculative or bespoke office rental charges would go a long way to allow building control departments to increase on-site inspectors and Architects to place full time Clerks of Works on projects.
I am sure the legislators will be able to take this forward and give us all a degree of comfort.
Archie Burleigh,
Meigle Cottage, Skelmorlie.
ALISON Rowat's lesson about the PFI/PPP schools (“Please Miss, why are our new schools falling down?”, The Herald, April 13) was top of the class, although I don't agree that a public inquiry would “simply be a case of throwing good money after bad”. After all, the education of our children has been interrupte, but far, far worse than that, thousands of children and their teachers have been put at risk of their schools disintegrating on top of them, a truly terrifying nightmare scenario. If we don't ask the questions we won't get the answers, and holding a public inquiry would be the best way to determine all the facts, and learn the lessons.
Ruth Marr,
99 Grampian Road, Stirling.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel