I CAN only assume that Brian D Henderson (Letters, April 20) has no acquaintances who are non-British or that those he does know are too polite to disabuse him of his fantasy that we are the envy of the world because we have the monarchy.

In my various travels around the world I have gained a very clear view of how the Windsors and the rest of the royal panjandrums are viewed by other nations. The monarchy and all its trappings are regarded as a theatrical show which is worth seeing but that is all. In the same way that we would not wish to live in a Gilbert and Sullivan operetta they have absolutely no desire to be lorded over by an unaccountable hereditary clan. In modern parlance the monarchy is treated similarly to the Kardashians, in as much as they are viewed by many but very few would want to ape them and allow them any influence in their lives.

In its simplest expression the attitude of non-Brits to the citizens of the UK is one of amusement and not a little bafflement that we kow-tow to this self-serving institution.

David Stubley,

22 Templeton Crescent, Prestwick.

WATCHING Jennie Bond’s nauseatingly sycophantic programme The Day I Met The Queen on BBC2 (April 20) prompts me to add my tuppenceworth to previous letters on the subject of the monarchy. Why some believe that we live in enlightened times when in actuality the distribution of wealth in the UK has never been more skewed towards the rich beats me.

The Queen is the linchpin from which all the imbalance in society hangs and as long as the monarchy exists then any aspiration of creating a meritocracy is a pipedream. There is no point in aspiring to live in an independent Scotland without a simultaneous complete restructuring of the social structure of society. Otherwise there would be no difference, just a different set of flunkies doing the bidding of the Establishment.

David J Crawford,

Flat 3/3 131 Shuna Street, Glasgow.

IAN W Thomson (Letters, April 20) comments adversely on the continuation of the Royal Family, with its hereditary aspect perpetuating the "class system", along with The House of Lords having many hereditary peers. Fair comment. He then spoils his argument by complaining about the majority in House of Lords being there through "political patronage" – obviously non-royals and non-hereditary.

Surely both points contradict each other?

Ian Gray,

41 Abercrombie Drive, Bearsden.