WHEN the Scottish Government announced the public inquiry into historic cases of child abuse in care in 2014, the then Education Secretary Angela Constance said it was an opportunity to confront the mistakes of the past and learn from them. She also insisted the Government would learn from the debacle of a similar UK inquiry and consult with abuse survivors about who should sit on the panel. The aim, said Ms Constance, was to ensure a brighter future for every child.
Sadly, it has not gone according to plan. Only last week, one member of the inquiry, Professor Michael Lamb, stood down because he said he did not believe it could act independently. And now the chair herself, Susan O’Brien, has resigned after facing the sack over comments she made at one of the inquiry’s sessions.
There are widely different interpretations of what was actually said but Ms O’Brien insists she was trying to lighten the mood. The consultant clinical psychologist Dr Claire Fyvie, who was also present, has a different view and says the comments were inappropriate, and the Deputy First Minister John Swinney appears to agree with her – before Ms O’Brien resigned, he had started the process to remove her.
Miss O’Brien may well, as she says, have been trying to lift the mood and it will not have been easy to take on what is in many ways an impossible job given the complex brief. But as the chair of such a difficult inquiry involving vulnerable witnesses, she should have been aware of the need for extreme sensitivity and how remarks can be mis-interpreted. Survivors of abuse have also had a difficult relationship with the inquiry and from the start an ill-judged comment from the chair had the potential to upset the inquiry, as indeed it now has.
However, there must also be a suspicion that ministers may be taking an opportunity to dispense with a chair who stood up to them and what the Scottish Government must not do now is allow the firm action it has taken on Ms O’Brien to lead to more interference. As Professor Lamb said when he stepped down, an inquiry such as this one should not be micro-managed by one of the bodies whose actions may ultimately be criticised. It is a principle the new chair will have to vigorously defend.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel