READING about the delay in the construction of the new children’s hospital in Edinburgh (“Setback for £159m hospital”, The Herald, August 22) I was struck by the comment blaming “unavoidable technical construction problems”. Here I have to declare an interest, having been the most senior healthcare architect involved in designing the exemplar scheme on which the bids were based.
The NHS was warned that the exemplar scheme was not properly finalised prior to the bid stage but we were told the layouts had to be issued to meet a deadline. The view was that any construction issues would be resolved by the bidders during the competitive dialogue process. I am therefore struggling to understand why the winning bid is now encountering problems. However, I can hazard a guess.
During the exemplar design process I attended room layout meetings with clinicians where the comments on some layouts varied from “totally useless” to “completely unacceptable”. Yet at bid stage we were told that the clinicians had signed off the relevant department layouts so it had to be built that way.
The bid consortium I subsequently joined analysed the plans and concluded the exemplar scheme was indeed seriously flawed with, for example, columns in the middle of rooms, bedrooms lacking adequate daylight, and so on. Building an underground car park and service area on a flood plain is also not a good idea and adds significantly to costs. Our team therefore developed an alternative set of plans to remedy these issues. However this strategy was rejected by the project managers who reiterated that the exemplar design had to be followed. Judging by the plans submitted for planning this appears to be more or less what’s being built.
There is a fundamental problem in such projects whereby project managers – who are used to managing process and costs – can effectively overrule clinicians who manage the treatment of patients. A minor cost increase can often deliver disproportionate benefits that can be recovered via more effective delivery processes over the lifetime of the building. Unfortunately it is rare to encounter this level of foresight within project management teams.
Incidentally our bid was the best clinical design solution in my view and had resolved many of the construction and technical problems. It was also the cheapest. Despite that we were placed last in the scoring.
Robert Menzies,
2 Burnbrae Gardens, Falkirk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here