THE radical plans in England to supposedly “ rebrand a host of small private education providers as universities” must be viewed as positive action in developing the sector to meet the social equality expectations we demand of educational opportunities in the 21st century (“Universities fight to defend status,” The Herald, October 26).

It was hardly a surprise to me when I read the protectionist view of Universities Scotland, who appear to consider this proposal as a potential threat to their “ proven and sustainable integrity”, notably in regards to their “ degree-awarding power”, while continuing to monopolise the elitist title of “university”.

I suggest that the current structure of post-school education is socially divisive.

It is well known that universities evolved historically from the days of medieval clergy teachings.

Doubtless, many realised that if they could lock up God in their own buildings and claim ownership, then why not do the same for higher education?

If Scotland’s tertiary education was to be designed today from scratch, I am certain that no one would even deign to consider our bifurcated system.

Nevertheless, due to an historical accident of circumstance, we seem permanently saddled with an unfit and antiquated framework.

One part of the sector comprises virtually autonomous establishments while our further education colleges largely follow a national structure of courses, assessments and accreditation.

Any bold evolutionary change which might help us move forward from this vocational versus academic schism has to be pursued in Scotland.

Bill Brown, 46 Breadie Drive, Milngavie.