COMMUNITIES around the Moray Firth will be, as I am, very grateful for the support of the Marine Conservation Society, the National Trust for Scotland, the Scottish Wildlife Trust, RSPB Scotland, Whale and Dolphin Conservation and WWF Scotland in the campaign to prevent risky ship-to-ship oil transfers in the Firth (“Concern voiced for dolphins over fuel transfers,” The Herald, October 26).
The application for a licence to transfer oil between ships in open water, rather than in the relative safety of Nigg harbour, threatens the vibrant, indispensable life of the Moray Firth. Its internationally important ecosystems not only support iconic bottlenose dolphins, among a huge variety of other animals and plants, but also underpin our vital fisheries and tourism industries.
When this kind of ship-to-ship oil transfer was proposed for the Firth of Forth a decade ago, Greens campaigned alongside environmentalists, scientists and local people, eventually persuading the new SNP Government to join the opposition. The plans were dropped. This time, however, the Scottish Government has so far declined to comment, and even failed to respond to the consultation run by the UK Maritime and Coastguard Agency, which will make the final decision on the application.
Worryingly, Highland Council’s SNP leader has said she “understands” that the Scottish Government actually support the proposal.
Time has not quite run out. The MCA has delayed a decision, giving the Government a second chance to respond. I appeal to Environment Secretary Roseanna Cunningham to join Scotland’s environmental organisations and the Moray Firth’s communities and oppose this dangerous scheme.
John Finnie MSP (Green, Highlands and Islands) The Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel