THOSE who argue that the UK is not working well to protect Scotland’s interests seem to have little shortage of ammunition at present. The decision by UK immigration ministers to reject a proposed solution to the crisis over postgraduate work visas is a blow, and a baffling one, to hopes in the higher education sector and beyond.
The UK Government’s abolition of post-graduate study work visas is driven by concerns felt largely in the south of England about abuse of the system and immigration in general.
In Scotland, the impact of withdrawing these visas has been troubling. Despite an eagerness to encourage qualified students with valuable skills to stay and contribute after their studies, universities have seen a sharp decline in numbers staying on after graduation. The Scottish Affairs Select Committee has warned that the change has made Scotland a less attractive place to study. The UK Government’s justification is not necessarily wrong. Home Office minister Robert Goodwill argues that different immigration systems for different parts of the UK would be confusing and cause difficulties for employers.
But the inconsistency of that position is indefensible. Westminster has already set up a scheme that does just what Mr Goodwill objects to: allowing four elite universities south of the Border to pilot two year after study work visas. Scottish universities will not be able to join the scheme for two years, if it is deemed a success.
Allowing Scottish universities to operate a similar scheme seemed a sensible response. It would have allowed the UK Government to assess the potential for such a measure to address Scotland’s population needs and workforce shortages in sectors such as finance and health. If there are vacancies in Scottish lecture theatres, perhaps our universities could put on lectures in logic for ministers and a tutorial on the efficacy of evidence-based policy.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here