ONCE again, disease in Scotland’s salmon farms has raised its ugly head. It is bad news for the industry, but potentially also for our wild salmon, should they swim into such troubled waters.
The outbreak of Amoebic Gill Disease (AGD) on farms in the Hebrides and Wester Ross presents a threat that may well call for intervention by the Scottish Government. AGD, a mucus-producing condition that suffocates the fish, is a nasty business for which salmon farms were supposed to be better prepared.
True, there is not much they can do about unusually high seawater temperatures, which do much to produce the disease. Crowding and poor water circulation in cages have also been identified as causes in cases abroad, where the problem has hitherto been more prevalent. Prevention is one thing, containment another, and it is incumbent on farms to sound the alert immediately, even if this amounts to broadcasting news that does them no favours.
Fish-farming has its foes, but also its friends. It is an economic growth sector. By providing jobs, it keeps people in areas threatened by depopulation. But it cannot do so at a risk to wild salmon nor while presenting a threat to Special Areas of Conservation.
Wild salmon interests have called on the Scottish Government to order the immediate slaughter of the farmed stocks in question. A drastic step indeed, particularly since we are dealing with an unquantified threat, due to the difficulty of diagnosis in wild fish.
However, wild salmon is so important for Scotland that the Scottish Government will have to examine all options and, at the very least, seek assurances about early notification while also investigating research into better treatments. Certainly, the disease needs to be brought under control immediately, with watertight safeguards in place before next spring when wild salmon smolts migrate.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here