SCOTTISH Labour leader Kezia Dugdale’s backing for a People’s Constitutional Convention to transform the UK into a federal state is yet more evidence of the growing recognition of the need for fundamental constitutional change. It follows similar proposals from former prime minister Gordon Brown over the last month.
It is not, of course, the first time that such calls have been made. Some leading voices in Labour have been calling for a federal UK for years. Nevertheless, Kezia’s commitment as leader of Scottish Labour is a significant and to my mind welcome development.
So the mood in Labour for a properly federal UK is clearly strengthening. But how can that general mood be turned into firm policies, which can then be made into a reality?
First, there needs to be more clarity about what is meant by federalism. From the range of views expressed, it is clear that for some people federalism simply means some more devolution for those parts of the UK which want it, which does not change the UK into a federal state.
Others recognise that federalism inevitably means that all parts of the UK must have their own legislative assembly, whether that is in the form of an English parliament, assemblies for English regions, or a system like the current EVEL arrangements to give MPs from England enhanced decision-making, on matters which only affect England.
Still others want to go as far as turning the UK into a fully confederal state, or one where different parts have shared competence over at least some areas of legislation – an idea for which Gordon Brown expressed some support in November.
Secondly, Labour needs to ensure that its policy on federalism is one that is adopted, agreed, and promoted by the party across Britain, not just in Scotland and a few other parts of the UK.
Much of the Labour Party in England has not been noticeably enthusiastic in the past about regional government, or an English parliament.
The policy needs to be argued for as a part of a fundamental shift of power back to people across the UK.
Federalism is not truly federal if it only applies to some parts of a state.
In her speech last week, Kezia called on the UK government to take the initiative to set up a People’s Constitutional Convention.
Maybe Prime Minister Teresa May might surprise us but I suspect she will not be rushing to do that so that is why Kezia was also right to call for Labour to take the initiative to set one up.
Such a convention would not, of course, be credible if it was a Labour-only initiative, so the concept would need to be taken forward on a cross party and a non-party basis in the way that the Scottish Constitutional Convention was in the 1990s.
However, to build up the momentum for such a convention, Labour also needs to develop its own ideas on what a federal UK could look like. If that policy development is to be accepted by Labour across Britain, it needs to be a joint venture for Scottish and Welsh Labour, along with English Labour.
Labour should now begin a comprehensive process of consultation and policy development on federalism, to involve all parts of the Labour movement – members, parliamentarians in Westminster and the nations, cities and local councils, trade unions – and the wider public as well.
In her speech, Kezia highlighted the work of the Commission on Social Justice set up by former Labour leader John Smith.
Now is surely the moment for UK and Scottish Labour to jointly establish its own wide-ranging policy commission on the reform of the UK, to inform its contribution to a future People’s Constitutional Convention.
And who better to lead such a commission than Gordon Brown, given his radical commitment not just to a UK constitutional convention but to a transformation of the UK state?
Mark Lazarowicz was Labour MP for Edinburgh North & Leith until 2015. He was a member of the Scottish Constitutional Convention
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel