HAVING read the various correspondence in the Letters Pages regarding a second independence referendum I have come to the conclusion that even if the Scottish Government came up with a cast-iron, 100 per cent guaranteed plan to a Scottish utopia many of your correspondents would reject it out of hand.
Most of the critics of independence for Scotland seem to believe that their argument is sound because it is based on estimates by economists. I hate to disturb their certainty, but economics is not a science. It is in fact no better than a sequence of guesses of varying levels of reliability based on data which is only relevant in a historical perspective. Unfortunately it is also subject to bias dependent on the economist’s political point of view. To quote Darryl Huff, "Lies, damned lies and statistics." An example of this was a prospective Conservative councillor who sent out an election leaflet asking people to respond whether they were in favour of a second referendum and unsurprisingly he received more against than for. Could that be because they were Tory voters? Undaunted he promptly sent out another leaflet stating that the majority in the constituency were against another referendum.
However, perhaps it is germane to ask if there is something underlying this knee-jerk reaction? After three centuries of subjugation is there now a deep-seated fear in a large section of the population which makes them frightened of taking responsibility for their own country? Are the economic theories merely a smokescreen to camouflage deeper insecurities? Are these people hiding under the skirts of Westminster and even though they know that Brexit is heading for disaster they lack the confidence to stand up to the Westminster ruling elite?
David Stubley,
22 Templeton Crescent, Prestwick.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel