I CAN only manage one cheer for the aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth, which starts sea trials this week (“Biggest warship is symbol of ‘British ambition’”, The Herald, June 27). Whilst the Royal Navy’s largest ever ship is undoubtedly an impressive achievement of British engineering, there is much to be concerned about.
Unlike previous British aircraft carriers which were equipped with British-made airplanes, the Queen Elizabeth will carry the hideously expensive American F35B Lightning II. Leaving aside questions over its performance, this fact will give the US an implicit veto on how we use these airplanes.
A further problem of buying major foreign weapon systems is that we tend to fall behind other countries technologically. with unfortunate consequences for our industry and economy.
Aircraft carriers do not operate in isolation but require support ships for protection. The Royal Navy is down to six guided missile destroyers and 13 frigates. Allowing for other naval commitments and ships that are undergoing refits and so on, we lack sufficient support ships to allow one let alone two British carriers to operate independently; nor can we afford to incur losses in combat.
We have skimped on defence for far too long; the time has come to greatly increase defence spending both to ensure that the Royal Navy has sufficient ships and to develop new weapon systems of our own.
Otto Inglis,
6 Inveralmond Grove, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel