ATTEMPTS to use “social rights” to drive housing improvements in Leith are highlighted in a new report from the Centre for Welfare Reform in Sheffield.
The report, out today, describes how the Scottish Human Rights Commission worked with tenants to survey 180 households to demonstrate the scale of poor housing conditions, including dampness, mould and vermin infestation.
The study, by Paul Hunt, professor of law at the University of Essex explores the potential for using legally binding obligations to challenge poverty and the kind of community neglect widely believed to have contributed to the Grenfell Tower disaster.
The UK signed up voluntarily to international obligations to protect and promote social rights such as the right of every person to truly affordable housing, adequate living standards, a fair health system and food security.
Unlike other countries, it hasn’t done anything to enshrine those rights in domestic law, however – perhaps unsurprising given Theresa May continues to talk about ‘tearing up’ existing human rights laws.
But knowledge of social rights and linked workers rights can still lead to change, Prof Hunt says, pointing to Leith and examples from Belfast and York where they have done so.
The Edinburgh tenants survey also revealed many tenants felt the council was slow to resolve maintenance issues. Using human-rights based indicators, residents approached the council in June last year and developed an action plan with officials.
New kitchens, heating, windows, ventilation and asbestos removal are among the outcomes achieved or planned for later this year and early 2018. Officials and councillors have agreed to use the survey results as a baseline to measure improvements.
“The fact I know that I have a right to a wind-tight, water-tight, mould free house means I don’t have to be scared,” said association treasurer Heather Ford.
The Human Rights Act is almost silent about workers’ and social rights. But the report says thinking about issues like food banks and landlord problems in terms of rights can empower communities and individuals to start to make them real.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here