YOUR front-page headline ("Misery on the trains: ScotRail hit by record penalties", The Herald, February 19) is somewhat over the top notwithstanding the problems and difficulties of ScotRail train services that are the cause of much vexation to both the travelling public and politicians of all persuasions.
As I have commented previously, other public bodies – the NHS and education in particular – are similarly bedevilled by those whom I term "outsiders" issuing reams of largely meaningless percentage structured figures.
Your editorial ("ScotRail still far off from destination of a better service", The Herald, February 19) is well structured in most respects. I would add to this by stating to all those who clamour for whatever changes they deem necessary, be careful what you wish for.
John Macnab,
175 Grahamsdyke Street, Laurieston, Falkirk.
RAIL passenger complaints of not enough seats and of station-skipping are caused by Abellio’s attempts to cut costs.
Abellio does not own the rolling stock it uses, so providing extra seats would mean hiring extra coaches, which would incur extra costs. Late arrivals of trains at termini are financially punished, so station-skipping makes up time and lessens the fines for Abellio.
When the contract was set up, Transport Scotland should have specified the number of seats required for each and every departure on the ScotRail timetable, and certainly should have banned station-skipping.
Ian Maclean,
3 Hamilton Crescent, Bishopton.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel