EACH year, around two million books are published worldwide and every one of them will either change your life, leave you spellbound or offer a profound exposition of “what it means to be human”. Or so the publicity blurbs would have you believe.
Herald reviewers do their best to help readers cut through all that flyleaf hyperbole and we aim to cover an array of Scottish and international titles, mixing fiction with non-fiction and sampling everything from politics and biography to mountaineering and fine art.
Sadly, finite space means we can only feature a small selection from the thousands of promising titles released each week. So, while reading books for a living can hardly be described as a tough job, having to pass over so many is a real source of a literary editor’s angst.
Then again, so is running reviews that are less than flattering. We choose titles we think will be worth reading and that will make for enjoyable copy, but critics have to be honest in their assessments. And while it’s probably a myth that John Keats died as a result of harsh reviews of his poem, Endymion, I doubt if any editor ever presses “publish” without a pang of sympathy for an author whose book has taken flak.
Reading is a subjective process, of course. Who hasn’t ploughed dutifully through a friend’s recommendation, wondering what on earth they saw in it? Reviewing is no different and ultimately, book-buyers and borrowers will judge for themselves. Vladimir Nabokov’s 1955 novel, Lolita, was dismissed by the New York Times’ Orville Prescott as not only “repulsive” but “dull, dull, dull in a pretentious, florid and archly fatuous fashion”. Yet within half-a-century, it had sold more than 50 million copies and although its theme is perhaps more controversial than ever, it’s still selling.
Alongside reviews, we sometimes run extracts, features and interviews, including an occasional series in which authors describe their writing methods. From these, we’ve learned that Alexander McCall Smith often starts work at 3am, Val McDermid never writes a word before her second morning coffee, and Chris Brookmyre begins each novel by wandering around his neighbourhood, audibly plotting murders into his mobile phone.
By inviting us into their workspaces, these authors offer fascinating insight into the creative process, reminding us that for all the glamour and hype associated with the £6 billion-a-year UK publishing industry, crafting a book is a solitary pursuit that requires discipline, perseverance and hard slog – often for little or no financial reward.
Few writers make grandiose claims about transforming readers’ lives or channelling the essence of the human condition (whatever that is). But if they can inform, entertain and offer a glimpse of how it feels to live in another person’s skin, their books deserve to be read.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here