I REFER to the recent exchange of letters on your pages on the matter of proposed buffer zones around abortion clinics in Scotland.
Public provision of abortion services in Scotland is such a thorny issue that regrettably it often tempts correspondents to resort to exaggeration and disparagement. For example, recent writers have suggested that visitors to abortion clinics in Scotland are routinely "confronted" or "harassed" by protesters, or have problems to do with "safe access", even having to "run a gauntlet" on their approach to these facilities. Protesters are additionally now being charged with misogyny. In fact, none of that is the case. I think I'm correct in stating that Police Scotland has at no time asked for additional powers to deal with unruly behaviour on the part of protesters (or those offended by same).
That aside, it's at least disappointing that many people in Scotland appear to remain blind to the fact that the protesters in question are driven solely by compassion for their fellow human beings: with rates of abortion in the UK consistently running in excess of 200,000 per year, it's a tragic fact that by far and away the most dangerous place for a pre-born child in our country is in the womb of a "pregnant person".
I can confidently state the above without exaggeration, disparagement or recourse to religious dogma.
Jim Kearns, Paisley.
READ MORE: Why we must keep our care and health services separate
READ MORE: Counselling rooms would end need for buffer zones
READ MORE: It's time to tell the unvarnished facts about electric cars
• I THINK that both Gemma Clark (Letters, February 24) and Jim Proctor (Letters, February 23) misunderstand my position on buffer zones. I am not against them. However a 200-metre zone would not impact the current demonstration on Hardgate Road in Glasgow. Why should a woman accessing any maternity facility have to alter her travel plans in order to avoid being confronted by these people? If it was a one-off perhaps, but not daily.
My conundrum is that I believe in the right to protest but not at the expense of causing distress to others. As an architect I was trained to design out problems so my alternative approach would be to design out the confrontation element.
Those opposed to abortion claim the right to offer "guidance", so let’s call their bluff, remove them from the street and stick them in a room. There they can sit all day and every day waiting for women to visit. The key difference is the woman gets to choose whether to engage with campaigners on her terms rather than theirs. It’s about containment and isolation of the problem rather than simply moving it.
And yes, many clinicians I know would strongly object to having such a room close by. But a good architect could design a discreet facility remote enough from clinical staff and facilities yet still accessible if a woman ever does decide to engage with the occupants. I fully accept that for some that would still be an unacceptable compromise.
That said, I can practically guarantee that any such offer will be rejected by the campaigners. They will not only lose the publicity they currently get but they will also be forking out a lot of money for no real gain. It will serve a purpose nevertheless because if they ever go to court claiming that their right to offer "guidance" is being curtailed by the imposition of a buffer zone, a judge will simply ask why the offer of a facility to dispense that guidance was rejected.
Robert Menzies, Falkirk.
Compromise on electric cars
DAVID Hay (Letters, February 27) echoes the range anxiety problem facing anyone contemplating buying an EV. One possible solution he could investigate is a self-charging hybrid car which does not require to be plugged in to an external electricity supply. Instead it combines an internal combustion (IC) engine with one or more electric motors, the former charging the latter. In some such cars the electric motor(s) provides the sole motive power to the driving wheels, and in others the IC engine also provides additional motive power when needed.
As with purely IC-engined cars, all Mr Hay needs to know is where to find a filling station from time to time to top up with fuel for the IC engine.
Alan Fitzpatrick, Dunlop.
Surely this isn't rocket science?
IT seems lots of countries are now able to land a vehicle on the Moon ("Odysseus becomes first private spacecraft to land on the Moon", heraldscotland, February 23). However, they seem to have difficulty landing upright which causes problems with solar battery charging; it's been reported that the US-built Odysseus tipped over and ended up on its side as it landed in the south polar region.
Self-righting robots have been a “thing” for at least two decades, so the technical effort of a Moon landing is being nullified by a perhaps-simple fix.
GR Weir, Ochiltree.
David Wilkie got me a new car
SANDY MacAlister's letter (February 27) reminded me of my £100 20-year old Morris Oxford purchased while living in Innellan in the 1970s. A family holiday all the way to Butlins in Ayr started well with the youngest of four suddenly being posted missing about 400 yards from the house; she was still sitting in her pushchair at the front door (warrant for child neglect has expired).
A first stop at Nardini's after crossing in the ferry left the week's budget stressed after knickerbocker glories were bought, then all went well until two miles short of Ayr, when the car engine expired. A friendly motorist took the family on to Butlins and an RAC van later pulled up, whereupon I became an instant member for about £7 and the car was quickly back in running order.
This episode led to serious thought on how to get a better car and the only realistic option was to start entering competitions with cars as prizes. To my amazement a few months later I won a Jubilee Mini in a Glasgow Herald competition, guessing how far, to the nearest inch, swimmer David Wilkie drove the car on a gallon of petrol. After a short period of enjoyment it was sold and a second-hand Cortina Estate replaced it. It's amazing what desperation can lead to.
James Graham, Clydebank.
Get the Letter of the Day straight to your inbox.
Stepping up to the plate
WILLIE Towers' kind words (Letters, February 28) were the cheese to my macaroni.
May I confirm that I had to jump through no hoops in efficiently and effectively organising my day?
My bottle is half full.
David Miller, Milngavie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel