POLICE officers are among our most valued public servants.
Every time a rapist, murderer or wife beater is jailed, it is because of police work.
But citizens expect officers to be catching criminals, not chasing arbitrary targets set by their force.
Today's revelations question whether the targets culture imposed on the public sector is doing more harm than good. At face value, recorded crime fell by 13% in the last full financial year and non-sexual violent crime dropped by 21%.
But former police officers say these figures should come with a health warning. They say pressure from the top means that officers wrongly classify and downgrade serious crime, in the knowledge that it will make the figures look good. A serious assault can sometimes be recorded as a common assault, and robberies recorded as something more minor.
The ex-officers say the number of recorded stop searches - more than 500,000 in the first nine months of Police Scotland - is an exaggeration.
It is alleged the computerised system allows some frontline officers to invent bogus stop-searches as a way of inflating their number. The claims echo revelations from England. Multiple inquiries are under way to look at the system in England and Wales, and it is time we looked at how crime is classified in Scotland.
This investigation should look at whether the targets culture has had a negative impact on officers' behaviour.
Without moves such as those our most valued public servants will begin to lose their value.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article