The horrors of Middle East conflict know no bounds.
The last few weeks saw mass civilian casualties in Gaza and now we have images of a suspected British jihadist beheading US journalist James Foley in Syria.
The Islamic State (IS) group to which the jihadist belonged is now recognised as the pre-eminent security threat to the region and beyond in terms of international terrorism. The question now is what would constitute the appropriate response to that threat?
In deciding what should be done, the spectre of our previous intervention in Iraq both frightens us and focuses the mind.
This newspaper opposed that war and is under no illusions as to what Western military intervention in Syria would mean in order to halt IS.
But reality is harsh in the Middle East. Allowing the Iraq war debacle and its ghost to stymie pressing diplomatic and military decisions about stopping IS is not an option.
Unpalatable as it might be, supporting moderate rebel fighters in Syria opposed to IS as we have the Kurds in Iraq is one way to go.
Opening dialogue with the regimes of Tehran and Damascus, both of whom have vested interests in defeating IS - albeit for different reasons - might also be considered.
What is not an option is to do nothing. Our main aim should not be to impose a solution on desperately divided countries but to end horrific slaughter and to ease suffering in whatever way we can.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article