SADLY I was not to read the contents of Allan C Steele's reply (Letters, November 24) to my previous letter(November 23) on the politics of wildlife. As usual the tactic is to completely ignore the lack of evidence of any law breaking by fox hunts.
The Hunting With Dogs Act uses the term “flush” in relation to driving a fox to the guns. I find Mr Steele's description of the farmer or smallholder with a gun somewhat comical as he obviously does not understand how difficult it is to force a fox to break cover. This is the practical reason why foxhunting developed, as it was an effective way of flushing a fox.
It would appear that he fails to see the moral dichotomy in his argument. I am sure he knows that people control rabbits, rats, pigeons and other pest species but there is no such moral outrage. The sports which he targets are those with social connotations. I know many people who dislike football and even though it has been responsible for many unfortunate deaths (Heysel, Hillsborough and so on) they do not try to prevent others from enjoying whichever pastime they enjoy. To cite bullfighting, badger baiting and dog fighting is a total non sequiteur as these pastimes are illegal in this country. Fox hunting is legal.
This is just another example of attempting to deprive others of something that they do not wish to do. I have never been foxhunting but I also have no desire to control others and deprive them of their pastime.
David Stubley,
22 Templeton Crescent, Prestwick.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel