THE RBS memo published by the Treasury Committee urging staff to “let customers hang themselves” is no joking matter (Revealed: RBS memo urges staff to ‘let customers hang themselves’", The Herald, January 18) – especially since the banks’ response to the crisis of 2008 and its impact on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and communities is still fresh in memory of many.
With current bank net lending to SMEs collapsing and Scottish companies facing financial distress, how are revelations like the RBS memo going to help and mend the broken trust between SMEs and banks? The concern now is that businesses are failing to plan for Brexit, in any shape or form, because of the uncertainties they face and if they were reluctant to consult banks before, how will they respond to stories like these?
At a time when trust between businesses and banks is most needed to build a strong and resilient economy, stories that confirm that banks worry more about their own balance sheets than the people they are meant to help is disturbing. Instead of apologetic excuses from chief executive Ross McEwan, what we need is reassurance that the banks will produce plans and products for their business customers to ensure that history will not be repeated.
Michelle Thomson,
Momentous Change Ltd,
Granary Business Centre, Coal Road, Cupar.
REGARDING bank closures ("Union: RBS closures plan a ‘betrayal’ of Scots people", The Herald January 17), I have yet to see any detail of the alleged survey that the Royal Bank of Scotland is saying has triggered the latest round of branch closures.
I have the following questions:
1. Does the survey exist?
2. Was it independent?
3. Were the results statistically significant?
4. Will the high heid yins provide the survey for independent analysis?
I ask the questions because:
1. I have yet to hear of an RBS customer who is happy about the closures.
2. We have yet to hear from anyone who took part in the survey.
So, does it exist?
Ian M Forrest,
Dalveen, Garvock Road, Laurencekirk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here