WHEN it comes to new products, the one question the public rightly wants to know is how safe is this? Even though e-cigarettes are now being used by millions of people in the UK, when it comes to vaping the issue of safety is yet to be fully answered.
If you are a smoker deciding whether to have another cigarette or switch to vaping, the advice from public health experts is that e-cigarettes are far less harmful than tobacco - which still claims the lives of 10,000 people in Scotland annually despite years of trying to tackle the problem.
For smokers struggling to stop, vaping can provide a useful alternative to cigarettes. The UK has chosen to take a different approach from many other countries in viewing vaping as a useful way to cut the appalling toll from tobacco.
Yet the experts also warn this does not mean e-cigarettes are completely harmless. The first major trial to investigate the safety of e-cigarettes for pregnant women and the unborn child highlights this concern.
It took more than sixty years and millions of death before a link between smoking and cancer was finally heeded in the face of a concerted propaganda campaign by tobacco industry. It is a costly lesson that must be heeded when it comes to scrutinising anything which may affect our health.
The dangers of smoking are well-known, and e-cigarettes do offer a 'healthier' alternative to cigarettes - but until their overall safety can be clearly established, vaping must be treated with caution.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here