Labour expended a lot of energy yesterday attempting to paint David Cameron as a series of damning pen portraits.
Out of touch, “nasty”, with a problem with women, it was quite the concerted effort.
They need not have bothered. The Prime Minister himself proudly appeared to present himself as a toff.
Asked about the abandonment of his plans to scrap the fox hunting ban, Mr Cameron did nothing to contradict those who depict him in that red blazer on top of the horse chasing, to the bitter end, the poor defenceless fox.
He appeared to fix Labour leader Ed Miliband with a large smile and a glint in his eye, as he replied to a question on fox hunting saying: “I have never broken the law and the only little red pests that I pursue these days are in this house.”
The Prime Minister was being pushed on the fox hunting commitment because Labour wanted to know whether it would appear in his Government’s “failure audit”.
Mr Cameron was not impressed. His Government was open, he said. It was transparent, and committed to putting more information in the public domain than Labour had ever done.
Which is why of course one of his key advisers was photographed walking down Downing Street earlier this week holding a document that said that the audit identified “problematic areas”, would lead to “unfavourable copy” highlighting “broken pledges”.
The document also suggested it could be quietly “published without fanfare” online to avoid overshadowing the Government’s relaunch earlier this week.
You remember the one. It was overshadowed by the announcement that one of the Coalition’s ministers in the Lords was resigning. Closely followed another 24 hours later by another minister in the Lords also standing down.
Well, at least the Coalition is good at making predictions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article