GEORGE Osborne has been accused of a “shocking display of hypocrisy” by Labour after it was revealed taxpayers footed a £40,000 bill to refurbish his Downing Street flat as he imposed austerity cuts on the country.
Maintenance and refurbishment of the apartment above No 10, used by the Chancellor, his wife Frances, and their two children, came in at £39,880 in 2011-12.
The previous year some £32,651 was spent on works but the Treasury made clear this money covered the state rooms and offices at Number 11 as well as the residence.
The latest details emerged through a Freedom of Information request obtained by the Daily Mail. Initially, the Treasury said it did not hold them but after the Cabinet Office confirmed it had billed the Treasury for the work, the Exchequer produced the figures.
A spokeswoman for the Treasury said: “No 11 Downing Street is a Grade I-listed building and as such the Government is obliged to ensure that it is maintained to an appropriate standard.”
She added: “By long-standing arrangement, the Treasury pays a contribution to the Cabinet Office for the space used by HM Treasury and the Chancellor of the Exchequer within the Downing Street estate, including maintenance of the No 11 state rooms and offices, and the No 10 flat.”
But Tom Watson, the deputy leader of the Labour Party, said: “George Osborne has implemented huge spending cuts that have hit the poorest hardest and warned there is stormy economic weather ahead.
“He should be setting an example by reigning in his own spending but the millionaire Chancellor has instead splashed out tens of thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money on home improvements.”
The Midlands MP added: “It is a shocking display of hypocrisy and another example of his terrible political judgement. He may have a flat at number 10 but he doesn't deserve to be handed the keys to the front door.”
The row over the Chancellor’s flat refurbishment follows that over David Cameron’s when £64,000 was spent refurbishing the larger four-bedroom apartment above No 11 used by the Prime Minister and his family.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel