The so-called "EdStone" stone tablet bearing Ed Miliband's 2015 general election pledges has helped land Labour a £20,000 fine from the electoral spending watchdog.
Labour omitted two payments totalling £7,614 relating to the eight foot block of stone from its election campaign spending return, a breach of the rules which sparked an Electoral Commission investigation.
The party was then ordered to review all of its election expenditure and the commission's subsequent analysis has concluded it missed 74 payments totalling £123,748, as well as 33 separate invoices totalling £34,392 from its spending return.
Read more: Nicola Sturgeon - I won't allow Scotland to be driven over a hard Brexit cliff edge
Labour treasurer Iain McNicol was found to have committed two offences under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (PPERA) and the party has now been fined £20,000.
It is the largest fine the Electoral Commission has imposed since beginning operations in 2001.
The commission's investigation into Labour's 2015 general election campaign spending return was opened on January 22 following allegations that it may have been incomplete.
The watchdog said: "Initial inquiries aimed to determine why two payments totalling £7,614, relating to spending incurred on a stone tablet - referred to in the media as the 'EdStone' - were missing from the party's campaign spending return.
Read more: Nicola Sturgeon - I won't allow Scotland to be driven over a hard Brexit cliff edge
"It was established that these payments were missing from the party's return and the commission launched an investigation."
Labour then carried out an internal review of its expenditure which found additional missing items as well as the omitted spending relating to the widely-mocked stone tablet.
The commission then identified further missing payments, including costs associated with the Labour Express and Labour Students tours, and items of spending by an individual candidate which had been allocated to central party spending but not included in the return.
In addition 33 invoices with a value greater than £200 were missing from the return, totalling £34,392.
The commission called in February for an increase in the maximum £20,000 penalty available to it for a single offence to an amount more in proportion with the spending and donations handled by large campaigners.
Its director of party and election finance, Bob Posner, said: "The Labour Party is a well-established, experienced party.
"Rules on reporting campaign spending have been in place for over 15 years and it is vital that the larger parties comply with these rules and report their finances accurately if voters are to have confidence in the system."
Read more: Nicola Sturgeon - I won't allow Scotland to be driven over a hard Brexit cliff edge
A Labour Party spokeswoman said: "Labour has co-operated fully with the Electoral Commission during its investigation into general election 2015 campaign spending by political parties.
"The commission's investigation found that internal procedural errors led to a relatively small number of items of expenditure not being declared properly.
"The party regrets these administrative errors.
"However, these amounted to just over 1% of our total spending of over £12 million during this election.
"We accept the findings of the report and have already tightened our internal recording procedures to address the commission's concerns."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel