The UK Government faces a wait until next year to find out whether it has won its historic Brexit challenge at the UK's highest court.
At the completion of four days of detailed legal argument, 11 Supreme Court justices reserved their ruling until the new year.
The Supreme Court's president Lord Neuberger said: "It bears repeating we are not being asked to overturn the result of the EU referendum.
Read more: Gordon Brown supports Scottish Labour calls for constitutional convention
"The ultimate question in this case concerns the process by which that result can lawfully be brought into effect.
"As we have heard, that question raises important constitutional issues and we will now take time to ensure the many arguments presented to us orally and in writing are given full and proper consideration."
Lord Neuberger added: "Having said that, we appreciate that this case should be resolved as quickly as possible, and we will do our best to achieve that."
Read more: No Brexit deal possible without consent of Holyrood, says Lord Advocate James Wolffe
The proceedings began on Monday amid a blaze of publicity around the world.
The hearing followed a High Court ruling against the Government in November.
Three judges ruled that Prime Minister Theresa May lacked legal power to use the royal prerogative to trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty to start the two-year process of withdrawing from the European Union.
Read more: Brexit offers 'opportunities' for fishing, says SNP Rural Economy Secretary Fergus Ewing
Opponents say that an Act of Parliament is needed.
But Thursday's proceedings were rounded off with a final claim by James Eadie QC, for the Government, that the use of the royal prerogative was lawful.
He said the Government was asserting that the prerogative provided "a specific power to notify Article 50 and so start the process of withdrawal notwithstanding that will result in changes to domestic law".
Gina Miller, the lead claimant in the successful High Court action before the Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas, said after the Supreme Court hearing: "The tone of this week's proceedings from everyone involved and many parts of the media showed respect, civility and professionalism and I very much hope that this will continue throughout the process of the UK's withdrawal from the EU."
Ms Miller, an investment fund manager and philanthropist who had endured death threats during the High Court hearing, added: "As my counsel Lord Pannick said, the constitutional elephant in the room remains - to give notice under Article 50 using the prerogative is an affront to parliamentary sovereignty."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel