It was the big moment that Theresa May had been waiting for, as she was invited into the Oval Office as the first foreign leader to visit the new US President Donald Trump.
But when she arrived, there was another British Prime Minister already there - in the shape of the famous bust of Sir Winston Churchill.
Read more: Theresa May in talks with President Donald Trump at White House
The bust has been at the heart of a long simmering diplomatic spat, with disgruntled British media accusing Mr Trump's predecessor Barack Obama of removing it as a snub, while the White House insisted it had just been moved to another room.
One of Mr Trump's first acts as president was to put it back in pride of place, in what Downing Street hopes is a sign of a deeper special relationship.
And he was eager to show it off to his British visitor, telling Mrs May it was "a great honour to have Winston Churchill back".
Shaking hands with Mr Trump, a smiling PM responded: "Thank you, Mr President, we were very pleased you accepted it back."
The bust was not the only change Mr Trump made to the Oval Office decor when he arrived at the White House last week.
Read more: Donald Trump accepts invitation from Queen for UK state visit
He also replaced Obama's crimson curtains with golden ones - perhaps to remind him of his favoured colour scheme in his home in New York. But the touch of gold was far removed from the bling of Trump Tower, with portraits of great past presidents lining the walls and maintaining its air of history and decorum despite the glitzy style of its new occupant.
And the bust of Martin Luther King, which had taken Churchill's place, remained gazing over at him from the other side of the room.
Mr Trump himself already had the air of the owner, getting a flunky to move a large table lamp so the cameras could get a better view.
Read more: Theresa May in talks with President Donald Trump at White House
As for Mrs May, dressed in a bright red two piece suit by Amanda Wakeley, she seemed delighted to be there, even if she could be forgiven for being a little apprehensive about the hour long chat ahead of her.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel