AMBER Rudd, the home secretary, has indicated acid attack convictions could soon carry life sentences as a crackdown on corrosive substances was unveiled by the UK Government.
Ms Rudd warned that an overhaul of current guidelines would ensure those who used noxious liquids as a weapon felt the “full force of the law". A Commons statement on the subject is due on Monday.
Writing in The Sunday Times, the home secretary said: "I am clear that life sentences must not be reserved for acid attack survivors."
Proposals to ensure acid and other corrosive substances can be classed as dangerous weapons are among the changes included in the shake-up for England and Wales.
The Government will also aim to put in place measures which restrict the sale of such substances by retailers, the secretary of state explained.
The move is part of a new strategy to crackdown on acid attacks following a recent spate of high-profile incidents, including five assaults that were linked in London on Thursday.
The Home Office said it will work with police and the Ministry of Justice to assess whether powers available to the courts, including sentencing, are sufficient.
Mrs Rudd wrote: "Today, I am announcing an action plan to tackle acid attacks. It will include a wide-ranging review of the law enforcement and criminal justice response, of existing legislation, of access to harmful products and of the support offered to victims."
"We will also make sure that those who commit these terrible crimes feel the full force of the law," she added.
"We will seek to ensure that everyone working within the criminal justice system, from police officers to prosecutors, has the powers they need to punish severely those who commit these appalling crimes."
Possession of acid or other corrosive substances with the intention to do harm can already be treated as possession of an offensive weapon under the Prevention of Crime Act, which carries a four-year maximum penalty.
The Crown Prosecution Service's guidance to prosecutors will now be reviewed to ensure it makes clear that acid and other corrosive substances can be classed as dangerous weapons, and what is required to prove intent.
The 1972 Poisons Act will be assessed to consider if it should cover more harmful substances, while retailers will be asked to agree to measures to restrict sales of acids and other corrosive substances.
New guidance will also be issued to police officers south of the border on preventing attacks, searching potential attackers for harmful substances and responding to victims at the scene.
More than 400 acid or corrosive substance attacks were carried out in the six months up to April 2017, according to figures from 39 forces in England and Wales.
Bleach, ammonia and acid were the most commonly used substances, the Home Office said.
Sarah Newton, the Government’s minister for crime, safeguarding and vulnerability, will outline the Government's strategy on combating acid attacks in the Commons on Monday.
In an earlier statement, Ms Rudd said: "Acid attacks are horrific crimes which have a devastating effect on victims, both physically and emotionally.
"It is vital that we do everything we can to prevent these sickening attacks happening in the first place.
"We must also ensure that the police and other emergency services are able to respond as effectively as possible, that sentences reflect the seriousness of the offences and victims are given the immediate support they need."
Ms Newton suggested age-verification checks could be required when buying household products which contain chemicals.
She told Sophy Ridge on Sunday on Sky News: "A lot of the chemicals that are being used are under your sink, are in your bathroom, these are readily available.
"So we're working with retailers and manufacturers... can we reduce the strength of some of the cleaning materials? With retailers, should we be asking for say age-verification checks for younger people, how practical would that be, how can we introduce those measures?
"So examining every step of the process to see what more we can do," she added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here