The UK’s data privacy regulator has warned MPs over the sharing of computer passwords.
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said it was “making inquiries” after two Conservative MPs tweeted claims they shared their login details with staff.
The incident was sparked by MP for Mid Bedfordshire Nadine Dorries, who was defending First Secretary of State Damian Green, who is the subject of a Cabinet Office inquiry into allegations pornography was found on a work computer used by him in 2008.
She said computer use by multiple people was common, and her staff “log onto my computer on my desk with my login everyday. Including interns on exchange programmes”.
In response fellow Conservative Nick Boles, MP for Grantham and Stamford, tweeted that he often forgot his own password and would “ask my staff what it is”.
The House of Commons handbook states that staff must not share passwords, but the rules do not appear to extend to MPs and their login details.
“We’re aware of reports that MPs share logins and passwords and are making inquiries of the relevant parliamentary authorities,” the ICO said on Twitter.
“We would remind MPs and others of their obligations under the Data Protection Act to keep personal data secure.”
It also included a link to an online guide on best practices for data security.
Ms Dorries defended her revelation following criticism on social media, adding that she was a backbench MP who did not have access to Government documents.
However, Jim Killock of online privacy watchdog Open Rights Group, said the practice of sharing log in details were a concern.
“On the face of it, Nadine Dorries is admitting to breaching basic data protection laws, making sure her constituents’ emails and correspondence is kept confidential and secure. She should not be sharing her log in with interns,” he said.
“More worryingly, it appears this practice of MPs sharing their logins may be rather widespread. If so, we need to know.”
He urged MPs’ staff and former staff to get in touch with the group if they had any knowledge of “insecure data practices in MPs’ offices”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here