THE US Government has accused a Scottish registered company of supporting the Russian military and security services and placed the firm on a sanctions list.
The Scotland on Sunday newspaper reports that Djeco Group, registered in Edinburgh’s New Town, has been placed on a blacklist alongside scores of Russian firms amid the country’s invasion of Ukraine.
The Scottish Limited Partnership (SLP) was included in a list of sanctions put in place by the US on March 9.
SLPs are controversial business arrangements which can allow owners of businesses to register their companies while remaining anonymous.
Last week, Scottish Secretary Alister Jack admitted that “further measures” will be taken in future to create more transparency around the ownership of SLP’s.
According to Companies House, Djeco Group was first registered in 2009 and the only person stated as having significant control in the firm is Mrs Evgeniya Bernova.
Jack was challenged on SLP's in the Commons last week
The group was set up as a holding partnership of two Maltese firms, one of which - MaltaRent Ltd - purportedly supplies equipment and services to filmmakers.
However, officials from the US ruled that its activities were tied to Putin’s increasingly isolated regime. The company is one of three UK based firms on the sanctions list.
The US Department of Commerce (DoC) said the decision to blacklist Djeco Group and 91 other firms was “based upon their involvement in, contributions to, or other support of the Russian security services, military and defence sectors”, as well as research and development efforts for the military.
The anti-corruption watchdog, Transparency International, which describes SLPs as “the UK’s home-grown corporate secrecy vehicle”, said the sanctions development highlighted the need for urgent action.
Steve Goodrich, the group’s head of research and investigations, said that Companies House acts as an ‘honesty box’ where firms can submit false information with very few consequences, leaving them open to abuse.
He said: “Ministers have pledged reform later this year, but given the current context and what is at stake, these changes can’t come soon enough.”
Alison Thewliss (below), the SNP’s shadow chancellor, who has been calling for reforms of SLPs for the past five years, said: “The case of Djeco Group illustrates the very complex web which can be spun using SLPs.
“They have been abused for many years now for a range of nefarious activities including bribery, corruption and arms deals, so it isn’t a great surprise to find this one linked to Putin’s regime. If the US authorities have blacklisted Djeco, the UK must now follow suit.”
She added: “The UK government and Companies House should now be reviewing all SLPs and PSCs to strike off those directors who have been sanctioned. The difficulty in all of this is that the Companies House register is not fit for purpose, and the information contained within it isn’t verified."
Ian Murray, Labour’s shadow Scottish Secretary, previously argued in the Commons that Companies House reforms should have been incorporated in the new Economic Crime Bill.
Murray told Scotland on Sunday that the allegations against Djeco represented “yet another example of the unscrupulous activities of SLPs which are aided by outdated legislation allowing them to obscure their true owners”.
He added: “The results of this investigation are deeply alarming. The UK government must examine Djeco Group further to ensure that no entity which is assisting Putin’s regime is able to operate with impunity in the UK.”
Last week, Murray challenged Jack over SLP’s in the House of Commons, to which the Scottish Secretary said “more will be done” in the next parliamentary session.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel