BORIS Johnson's honours list is a disgrace and undermines the status of the House of Lords, according to Scotland's most prominent historian.
Sir Tom Devine attacked the nominations to parliament's upper chamber made by the former Prime Minister which include that of the Secretary of State for Scotland.
The emeritus professor of history at Edinburgh University described Alister Jack as a "lackey" who was in line for a seat because of "unceasing and supine loyalty" to a "discredited" Mr Johnson.
Former PMs are allowed to hand out peerages after they have left Downing Street and often choose to reward party donors and supporters.
Mr Jack was appointed Secretary of State for Scotland by Mr Johnson in 2019 and was a consistent backer of the PM throughout the Partygate scandal that eventually forced his resignation.
He was one of the few ministers who did not resign from Mr Johnson's government following the revelations.
The Dumfries and Galloway MP kept his Cabinet job during the short Liz Truss administration and was reappointed last month by new PM Rishi Sunak.
The Times reported that Jack is one of four Tory MPs who will be elevated to the Lords by Mr Johnson's resignation honours list.
Nadine Dorries, the controversial former culture secretary, who was another of Mr Johnson's close allies, is also in line for a peerage.
Mr Johnson has also nominated two loyal advisers to become the youngest life peers in history. Ross Kempsell, 30, and Charlotte Owen, a former assistant to Johnson believed to be in her late twenties.
"I doubt whether there has ever been a more disgraceful resignation honours list than that being contemplated and reported in the media than that from the comprehensively discredited former Prime Minister Boris Johnson," Sir Tom told The Herald on Sunday.
"The lackeys mentioned in the list, including the Secretary of State for Scotland, have only one thing in common, unceasing, adoring and supine loyalty to the most amoral PM , not only in living memory, but for a very long time before that.
"Their membership of the Lords, if granted, will confirm its dubious status with 173 sitting members as the second largest legislature on earth after China’s National People’s Congress..
"The majority of the men of and women who serve in the House of Lords at present are men and women of undoubted distinction, experience and ability. The Lord Speaker John McFall is a Scot of unimpeachable integrity. How can he and they tolerate this List which can only bring dishonour to their House?"
Mr Johnson’s plans for a list of peerages came under criticism in July with the Lord Speaker saying it could erode “public confidence in our parliamentary system”.
It was reported that the House of Lords Appointment Commission (Holac), the body responsible for vetting peerages, was holding up Mr Johnson's plans.
Lord McFall was understood at the time to be talking to Philip Norton, a Conservative peer, about his private member’s bill that would grant statutory powers to Holac.
It would prevent future Prime Ministers from recommending peers to the Crown before the commission’s verdict on their suitability and would also require them to tell the commission why the nominees meet the appointment criteria.
During the summer Lord McFall wrote to Mr Sunak and Ms Truss, the then final candidates in the Tory leadership race, urging them not to follow Mr Johnson’s modus operandi that has led to accusations of cronyism.
In his letter, Lord McFall said: “A House of Lords that is too big, combined with the fact that some recently appointed members have not been especially active, undermines public confidence in our parliamentary system. I am sure you agree that public trust in politics and in our parliament and constitution is crucial.”
Asked to respond to Sir Tom's concerns, a spokeswoman referred to previous comments Lord McFall had made.
He said: “There is a case for examination of the appointments process, including a more robust vetting system and potentially stronger powers for Holac, ensuring that new appointees are able to make a worthwhile contribution to the important work of the house.
"I would urge the government to look at this, drawing upon the work of those who have already taken extensive evidence on this and proposed sensible reforms. I am always open to engagement with the government on these matters.
"An examination of the appointments system is, however, just one element of what needs to be a bigger package of reform of the House of Lords, including reducing the size of the house and increasing the diversity of its members allowing us to reach out to all parts of the United Kingdom.”
Last week after reports emerged that the Scottish Secretary was among those nominated for a peerage, a spokesman for Mr Jack said: “We cannot comment on speculation about peerages. Alister Jack is absolutely committed to representing his constituents and working with the Prime Minister to continue to deliver for people in Scotland.”
It is understood that if Mr Jack's peerage goes ahead, he would remain as an MP until the next general election and take up his seat then.
The move, criticised by the SNP, would avoid a by-election.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel