"We still think of a powerful man as a born leader and a powerful woman as an anomaly."
I bet those words from novelist Margaret Atwood will give rise to a wry smile. But of course the way society is reflected in Scotland's corridors of power is incredibly important and it's about time we grasped this particular thistle.
The Herald had it spot-on yesterday with its comment that a healthy democracy should mirror the communities it serves.
There is a growing consensus that allowing parties to simply encourage women to put their names forward isn't working. At the moment only a fifth of councillors in Scotland are women and only one third of MSPs are.
Scottish Greens would like to see an equality audit for every party standing candidates.
We like the idea of an obligation on parties to put forward a minimum of 40% of candidates from either sex.
In our party 40% of candidates must be women – 50% in target seats – and we have mechanisms in place to ensure this.
It is obviously healthy for politics.
If we offer more female candidates, they are more likely to be elected which in turn will show that it is possible to be one of those powerful women Atwood referred to.
If we had more women councillors would we see some of our best nurseries closed when savings are demanded?
Would we see issues such as domestic violence and childcare getting further up the agenda?
I'm not saying we could always expect different decisions but at least we could be assured that a more democratic range of views was aired.
Why are there no women in the "quad" running the UK Government? (I know: Calm down, dear.) And at a local level how many leaflets for the council elections have you received featuring female candidates? One party in my home city is only fielding two in the 17 wards it's contesting.
Scotland is a diverse country and this must be reflected in those with whom the buck stops.
Alison Johnstone is the Green MSP for Lothian
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article