With the First Minister off in California watching cartoons, it fell to Nicola Sturgeon to hold the Holyrood fort.
Whether she could also hold her own was another matter.
Johann Lamont had been working on her jokes. This is a lot more fun than working on policies, but where Labour is concerned the distinction isn't always clear. Courtesy of the SNP, Lamont had plenty of material to work with.
Rumour has it that the party of independence has been forbidden to use the word independence, for fear of putting people off. If the spin engineers have anything to do with it, they'll presumably be known as the Scottish Near-enough Party. Lamont thought this was hilarious.
It was almost as funny, in fact, as someone asking what the Labour in Labour Party stands for these days.
Still, Lamont had seen an opinion poll suggesting support for a Yes vote has dipped. Before you knew it, this became "the fact that independence is becoming more and more unpopular because of airy and meaning-less assertions from the likes of the Deputy First Minister".
One airy idea to which Lamont returns, week after week, is the SNP claim that Scotland would have a seat on the monetary policy committee of the Bank of England. The fact that we don't have such a thing, and have never had such a thing, did not detain the Labour leader.
What about the EU, the pound, the monarchy, financial regulation, the Union flag? According to this line of attack, the SNP are either asserting or compromising. That much is true: the Nationalist message is becoming distinctly fuzzy.
Sturgeon dealt with it well enough, nevertheless. The benefits of independence overlooked by Labour – the avoidance of illegal wars, the expulsion of nuclear submarines, protection against Labour's "new friends", the Tories – were given an airing.
The Labour leader had a nearly-funny routine, meanwhile, about Wallace, Stirling Bridge and the victors keeping Edward as king and sending him "homeward with a seat on the monetary policy committee". Only a pedant would remember that Wallace won his battle.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article