THE Bureau of Investigative Journalism, which was behind the botched Newsnight programme into child abuse, has also suffered a serious blow over the crisis at the BBC with the resignation of its editor Iain Overton.
Mr Overton, 39, announced his departure on Twitter, where he had written that a "very senior political figure" would be exposed as a paedophile on November 2, hours before the report was broadcast.
Tory backbencher Andrew Bridgen used a parliamentary motion to call on the funders, which include Oxfam, Save The Children and the Joseph Rowntree Trust, to cut all ties with the bureau. He said it was now "totally discredited as a serious producer of quality journalism".
It was created in 2010 and is based at London's City University as an independent and not-for-profit operation.
It produces investigations for press and broadcast media, working in collaboration with other news groups with the "aim of educating the public and the media on both the realities of today's world and the value of honest reporting".
James Lee, chairman of the bureau's trustees, said it was "launched and built up under Iain's editorship". He described Mr Overton's resignation as a "real tragedy".
"Iain has played a pivotal role in the bureau's success to date. Under his editorship the bureau has gained a reputation for quality journalism as well as winning awards," he added.
In 2004, Mr Overton won a Scottish Bafta for the expose Security Wars, a film about corruption in the Scottish security industry.
The bureau has also worked with Panorama and Channel 4 News and has won a number of journalism awards.
It said an inquiry had been established to examine the Newsnight story.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article