TRANSPARENCY has been called for over the finances of the Commons Speaker after it emerged the taxpayer has spent thousands of pounds in tax to enable John Bercow and other senior Westminster officials to live in grace and favour homes.
HM Revenue and Customs has classed the use of the UK Parliament's historic residences as a personal taxable benefit. Yet for at least the past four years the Commons authorities have agreed to meet liabilities, which cover running costs and council tax, from public money.
Senior officials make a "contribution" of a few hundred pounds a year each but it is not clear whether the Speaker does.
Protracted negotiations with HMRC also now seem to have left Mr Bercow's residence exempt from tax altogether because while he is housed by the Commons, he is paid directly from UK Government coffers.
Details of the arrangements – which appear far more generous than those granted to David Cameron and George Osborne for their Downing Street flats – came to light after freedom of information requests.
A spokesman for the agency said that while provision of the accommodation itself is not liable to tax, personal usage of the living facilities had been treated as a benefit in kind between 2008 and 2010.
The ministerial code explicitly states that the Prime Minister and Chancellor must pay the tax liabilities on their residences.
Asked whether, like other officials, Mr Bercow paid a contribution to running costs, the spokesman replied: "No information is held."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article