COMPLAINTS about Scottish Government secrecy to the information watchdog more than doubled last year, as the total number of appeals about public bodies rose by one-quarter.
The figures prompted Labour to accuse the Government of an "obsession with secrecy" while the Government insisted that it was seeking to legislate to improve the system.
The first annual report of new Commissioner, Rosemary Agnew, shows that her office received 524 appeals in 2011-12, up by 100 on the previous year, a rise of almost 24%. Within that increased total the proportion of appeals relating to the Scottish Government or its agencies rose from 15% to 28%.
Labour's Paul Martin said: "The fact that the number of complaints from members of the public about the SNP Government has almost doubled in a year is symptomatic of the SNP's obsession with secrecy."
He added: "The Freedom of Information Act is a pillar of our democracy and the SNP is treating it with utter contempt."
Ms Agnew told MSPs last week an estimated 15,000 families had lost the right to FoI their landlord because of the shift from councils to housing associations.
She said: "It is simply not acceptable that citizens' rights continue to be eroded through complex changes in the delivery of services."
The Commissioner told The Herald the trends were probably a mixture of the decline in the number of bodies responding under arms-length arrangements and growing public knowledge of the right to appeal to her office.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: "We are currently progressing an FOI Bill through parliament which will improve the system and make more information available to the public earlier."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article