THERE could not be a worse time to abandon the Coalition's austerity programme, Danny Alexander, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, will declare today.
He will make the claim after Liberal Democrat sources mooted the idea of introducing extra council tax bands for expensive property as an alternative to the mansion tax.
In his keynote speech to party conference, the Highland MP will brush aside calls made by Labour and the SNP for a Plan B – rejected by delegates in a vote yesterday – to pump billions of pounds into new capital investment projects and declare that the UK Government's austerity programme is the only foundation for future growth.
He will say: "We have rebuilt the confidence in this nation's ability to pay its way in the world, we can now put that credibility to work for the British people.
"There could not be a worse time to argue that we should abandon our plan. "
Mr Alexander will say it was the "right, pragmatic" response to worsening growth forecasts for the Coalition to push some spending cuts into the next parliament.
Meanwhile, it has emerged that Nick Clegg has suggested the creation of two or three new council tax bands on high-end properties across the UK as an alternative to the proposed 1% annual mansion tax on properties worth more than £2 million.
Party sources suggested the plan could hit the same householders as those who would be affected by the mansion tax. Chancellor George Osborne is thought to be open-minded about the proposal while Prime Minister David Cameron is more hostile.
The proposal would not mean a complete revaluation of properties but simply introducing two or three new tax bands for expensive homes north and south of the Border.
Elsewhere in his speech today, Mr Alexander will warn wealthy tax dodgers that "we are coming to get you".
He will reaffirm his commitment to tackling tax avoidance and evasion, saying the Government is on track to raise £4 billion this year from a £900m investment announced two years ago.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article