The number of appeals lodged by immigrants against decisions to remove them from the country rose more than 40% year-on-year, MPs heard yesterday.
David Wood, interim director general of Immigration Enforcement within the Home Office, revealed the surge in appeals to the Home Affairs Select Committee.
Figures released by the Home Office later confirmed that 637 appeals were lodged in the first three months of 2013, compared with 448 in the previous year.
The committee also heard that out of 48,660 reports of suspected illegal immigration recorded by the UK Border Agency in its tip-offs database, only 660 or 1.3% led to actual removals. This followed 2695 investigations with visits by immigration enforcement officers and 1840 arrests.
Home Secretary Theresa May said the Government intended to speed up the process of deportation through its forthcoming Immigration Bill.
"It is my intention that the Immigration Bill will enable us to deport people more swiftly and to take action against people more swiftly," Mrs May said. "Members of the public get very upset when they see people going from appeal to appeal, trying one route to stay here, appealing, finishing that route, trying another route."
A Home Office spokeswoman added: "This is precisely why we are looking to change the law... We want to ensure the courts properly reflect Parliament's view that serious criminals should be deported, unless there are very exceptional circumstances."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article