A CALL by Liam Fox for a five-year freeze on public spending to pay down the national deficit and fund tax cuts as well as an end to protecting certain Whitehall budgets has been firmly rejected by David Cameron.
Just days before the Spring Budget, the former Defence Secretary – regarded as a standard-bearer for the Tory Right – insisted it was time to reverse the "great socialist coup" of the last decade by ending the culture of welfare dependency.
In a speech to the Institute for Economic Affairs, the ex-GP from East Kilbride said: "The country will be at its best when the Government is small and people are left to enjoy the fruits of their own labour.
"In leaving money in people's pockets, economic activity will follow. People will buy houses, invest for their future or just go shopping."
He suggested freezing public spending to free up £345bn over five years; withdrawing benefits like the winter fuel allowance from wealthy pensioners; a temporary Capital Gains Tax holiday; scrapping housing benefit for most under-25s to save £1.8bn and a stamp duty discount for the under-30s to help people get on the property ladder.
Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat Business Secretary, accused Dr Fox of waging an "ideological jihad" against public expenditure. However, he agreed that ring-fencing the budgets of health, education and overseas aid risked distorting public spending.
However, Mr Cameron speaking at a Mercedes-Benz training academy in Milton Keynes to mark Apprenticeship Week, pledged to continue with Plan A, which includes protecting certain budgets.
"As Prime Minister, I am never short of advice but there's one piece of advice I won't take and that's the piece of advice that says you ought to cut the National Health Service budget," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article