WITH David Cameron being asked if he is a man or a mouse, Nick Clegg wasted no time in flexing his political muscles by declaring that, if he had his way, pips, not mice, would be squeaking all over Britain.
The Deputy Prime Minister was seeking to create a bit of clear yellow water ahead of next month's party conference.
The LibDem troops, following constitutional defeats on AV and Lords reform are feeling a mite depressed, and so their leader is performing what has become a familiar ritual before the troops gather in Brighton – differentiation.
The Tory response to Mr Clegg's suggestion was predictable with backbencher Bernard Jenkin denouncing it as the "politics of envy" while George Osborne took a more diplomatic line, warning that the Coalition did not want to scare off wealth creators.
With chances high that the economic gloom will still be around at the next General Election, the Chancellor has signalled another £10 billion in welfare cuts, which makes the LibDems blanch. So their leader is flagging up an alternative source of income – the asset rich.
Tim Yeo's "man or mouse" challenge was surprising for its boldness – as was his Conservative colleague Brian Binley's description of Mr Cameron as Mr Clegg's "chambermaid" – but showed just how incensed some Tories are. They think their leader has been too nice and compliant to LibDem wishes.
With a reshuffle imminent and the Tory conference weeks away, the PM will be urged to show he is a man with a mission and not a wee, sleekit, cow'rin, tim'rous beastie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article