Genetically modified food should be grown and sold widely in Britain and opponents of the technology are talking "humbug", according to the UK Environment Secretary.
Owen Paterson made the remarks amid speculation that ministers were ready to relax controls on the cultivation of GM crops.
Advocates argue the techniques increase crop yields, avoid the need for pesticides, and could be essential in assuring Britain's future food security.
"Emphatically we should be looking at GM ... I'm very clear it would be a good thing," Mr Paterson said. "The trouble is all this stuff about Frankenstein foods and putting poisons in foods.
"There are real benefits and what you've got to do is sell the real environmental benefits."
The Coalition has allowed small-scale cultivation trials for GM food but widespread use is effectively banned.
Some GM products are contained in imported foods, but most supermarkets have banned the ingredients from their own-brand products because of public unease.
However, the Government has run a consultation exercise about new "agri-tech" measures to increase the efficiency of British farms. A formal ministerial response is due next year.
An environmental risk assessment on GM crops, commissioned by Holyrood in 2010, concluded several GM crops could be grown in Scotland in the next five to 10 years, should they be approved at EU level.They include herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape, maize and cereals and blight-resistant potatoes.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article