HOLYROOD'S vital committee system is no longer fit for purpose, a group of the parliament's most senior MSPs have warned.
In an outspoken attack, elder statesmen Hugh Henry, Duncan McNeil and Michael McMahon accused SNP chiefs of using their in-built majorities on cross-party committees to close down scrutiny of the Government.
They spoke out after The Herald learned that demands for a detailed investigation into SNP benefits plans were this week secretly voted down by Nationalist MSPs on the welfare reform committee.
The snub follows a bitter row over the European committee's decision to block an inquiry into an independent Scotland's membership of the EU, and clashes within the health committee that saw SNP members accused of resisting demands for care watchdogs to give evidence in case it could embarrass ministers.
Labour veteran Mr Henry, who has served on a string of committees, said SNP MSPs were routinely receiving lines of questioning for ministers and other witnesses from party whips.
He also condemned the increasing use of private sessions – demanded by Nationalist MSPs – to control the work of the committees away from the eyes of the press and public.
He said: "The committees were held up to be cutting edge of the Scottish Parliament. What we are now seeing is a deliberate attempt to dumb down the committees, to neuter them and avoid any critical comment about the Government.
"We are heading in a very dangerous direction for Scottish democracy, where criticism and dissent are being eliminated."
Mr Henry added: "If you think back to the early days of the Parliament, the whips had very little influence on the committees. Now committee members are routinely taking their line of questioning from the whips."
The latest row came over a bid by opposition MSPs on the welfare reform committee to demand greater financial scrutiny of Government plans for benefits due to come under Holyrood control next year.
Last week the committee staged a high-profile hearing in which one campaigner, Henry Sherlock, 50, launched a fierce attack on UK Government reforms, telling MSP he had been reduced to a "blind beggar".
However, in private SNP MSPs blocked calls for more detailed information on Scottish Government plans.
Labour's Michael McMahon, the committee convener, said: "Labour members on the committee were concerned at the extent to which SNP MSPs were prepared to block a more open process for the scrutiny of the Government's Welfare Bill despite demands for it from stakeholder groups. I have never known such a blatant manipulation of evidence in my 13 years in the Parliament."
Duncan McNeil, convener of Holyrood's health committee, claimed the SNP was preventing its MSPs from fulfilling their wider role as parliamentarians.
He said: "The committees are not fulfilling their role. They are no longer fit for purpose. It's a fundamental issue if the committees cannot hold the Government to account."
But the MSPs' complaints were dismissed by Christine Grahame, the SNP convener of the justice committee.
She said: "There are some good conveners and some not so good and it's nothing to do with their politics. It is all about who is sitting in the chair.
"My committee has given the cabinet secretary quite a rough time about plans to end the need for corroboration in criminal cases and about cuts to legal aid. I would never suppress a question from any committee member."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article